Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/newcommand.js
Skip to main content

Section Solutions for Chapter 6

Solutions to Exercise 6.1.6

6.1.6.1 Various formulas are possible. Most simply, the sequence can be described by the recurrence relation \displaystyle s_1=4\text{,} \displaystyle s_i=2s_{i-1}+1 for \displaystyle i \ge 2\text{.} With this description, the next term is \displaystyle s_5=2(39)+1=79\text{.}

6.1.6.3 Adjusting the recurrence relation from Example 6.1.5, we obtain the new relation
\begin{equation*} r_n=r_{n-1}-20+.01(r_{n-1}-20)\text{.} \end{equation*}
This simplifies to \displaystyle r_n=1.01(r_{n-1}-20)\text{.} We still have \displaystyle r_0=2000\text{.} We now have
\begin{equation*} r_1=1.01(r_0-20)=1.01(1980)=1999.80\text{.} \end{equation*}
Stavroula is (marginally) losing money from the beginning. This situation will only get worse as her starting balance each year dwindles.

Solutions to Exercise 6.2.6

6.2.6.1 Proof. Base case: \displaystyle n=1\text{.} We have \displaystyle b_1=5 and \displaystyle 5+4(1-1)=5\text{,} so \displaystyle b_n=5+4(n-1) when \displaystyle n=1\text{.}

Inductive step: We begin with the inductive hypothesis. Let \displaystyle k\ge 1 be arbitrary, and suppose that the equality holds for \displaystyle n=k\text{;} that is, assume that \displaystyle b_k=5+4(k-1)\text{.}

Now we want to deduce that

\begin{equation*} b_{k+1}=5+4(k+1-1)=5+4k\text{.} \end{equation*}

Using the recursive relation, we have \displaystyle b_{k+1}=b_k+4 since \displaystyle k+1 \ge 2\text{.} Using the inductive hypothesis, we have \displaystyle b_k=5+4(k-1)\text{.} Putting these together gives

\begin{equation*} b_{k+1}=5+4(k-1)+4=5+4k-4+4=5+4k=5+4(k+1-1)\text{,} \end{equation*}

as desired. This completes the proof of the inductive step.

By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, \displaystyle b_n=5+4(n-1) for every \displaystyle n \ge 1\text{.} â—¾

6.2.6.3 Proof. Base case: \displaystyle n=0\text{.} We have \displaystyle 0!=1 (by definition) and \displaystyle n=0\text{,} so \displaystyle n! =1 \ge 0=n\text{.} Thus, \displaystyle n!\ge n when \displaystyle n=0\text{.}

Inductive step: We begin with the inductive hypothesis. Let \displaystyle k \ge 0 be arbitrary, and suppose that the inequality holds for \displaystyle n=k\text{;} that is, assume that \displaystyle k! \ge k\text{.}

Now we want to deduce that \displaystyle (k+1)! \ge k+1\text{.} Using the definition of factorial, we have \displaystyle (k+1)!=(k+1)k! since \displaystyle k+1 \ge 0+1=1\text{.} Using the inductive hypothesis, we have \displaystyle k! \ge k\text{.} Putting these together gives

\begin{equation*} (k+1)! =(k+1)k!\ge (k+1)k\text{.} \end{equation*}

If \displaystyle k \ge 1\text{,} then

\begin{equation*} (k+1)k \ge (k+1)1=k+1 \end{equation*}

and we are done. If \displaystyle k=0\text{,} then \displaystyle (k+1)!=1!=1 =k+1 and again the inequality is satisfied. This completes the proof of the inductive step.

By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, \displaystyle n! \ge n for every \displaystyle n \ge 0\text{.} â—¾

Solutions to Exercise 6.3.5

6.3.5.2 Proof. Base cases: We will have four base cases: \displaystyle n=12\text{,} \displaystyle n=13\text{,} \displaystyle n=14\text{,} and \displaystyle n=15\text{.}

For \displaystyle n=12\text{,} I can get $12 onto my gift card by buying three increments of $4, since \displaystyle 4+4+4=12\text{.}

For \displaystyle n=13\text{,} I can get $13 onto my gift card by buying two increments of $4 and one of $5, since \displaystyle 4+4+5=13\text{.}

For \displaystyle n=14\text{,} I can get $14 onto my gift card by buying two increments of $5 and one of $4, since \displaystyle 4+5+5=14\text{.}

For \displaystyle n=15\text{,} I can get $15 onto my gift card by buying three increments of $5, since \displaystyle 5+5+5=15\text{.}

Inductive step: We begin with the (strong) inductive hypothesis. Let \displaystyle k \ge 15 be arbitrary, and assume that for every integer \displaystyle i with \displaystyle k-3 \le i \le k\text{,} I can put $\displaystyle i onto my gift card.

Now I want to deduce that I can put $\displaystyle (k+1) onto my gift card. Using the inductive hypothesis in the case \displaystyle i=k-3\text{,} I see that add can put $\displaystyle (k-3) onto my gift card by buying increments of $4 or $5. Now if I buy one additional increment of $4, I have put a total of $\displaystyle (k-3+4) = $\displaystyle (k+1) onto my gift card, as desired. This completes the proof of the inductive step.

By the (strong) Principle of Mathematical Induction, I can put any amount of dollars that is at least $12 onto my gift card. â—¾